[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vi vs emacs vs pico

To: Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org>
Subject: Re: vi vs emacs vs pico
From: Markus Friedl <Markus.Friedl@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:46:45 +0200
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
References: <Pine.BSO.4.10.9909221228100.30263-100000@bofh.accesscom.net> <Pine.BSO.4.10.9909221937050.10385-100000@hobbiton.org>

On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 07:40:55PM -0500, Leif Pedersen wrote:
> Why do we use vi? 

	"Ed is the standard text editor"
	http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~smikes/emacs/ed.html

References:
- Re: Man pages ksh.
  - From: George Dodd <root@bofh.accesscom.net>
- vi vs emacs vs pico
  - From: Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org>
- vi vs emacs vs pico
  - From: Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org>

Prev by Date: ipnet/ipf performance
Next by Date: in defence of man pages
Prev by thread: Re: vi vs emacs vs pico
Next by thread: Re: vi vs emacs vs pico
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread