[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SNMP
Artur Grabowski <art@stacken.kth.se> wrote:
> > I would recommend going straight to the official source from
> > http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/ucd-snmp/ . The OpenBSD port is very old.
> > The patch file in the OpenBSD port appears to have been integrated into
> > the main distribution nowadays, too.
>
> In the Makefile in every port there is a MAINTAINER field. It's easy
> to look at that field and mail the maintainer that the port is outdated,
> or even better mail him an updated port. sendbug should also work.
It's not a bug. I don't want to hassle a developer for something unless
I have a real need for some assistance. I could spend all day every day
sending in a million sendbugs in search of a perfect world, but I don't
think it would be a sensible thing to do.
> If people would spend one minute on doing sendbug, instead of swearing, when
> they find a bug, the world would be a better place.
Good thing I didn't swear then. Try reading what was written, not what
you expected to be written.
Cheers
Jon
--
\/ Jon Ribbens / jon@oaktree.co.uk
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SNMP
- From: Michael Shalayeff <mickey@lucifier.dial-up.user.akula.net>
- References:
- SNMP
- From: Mauricio Martins da Costa <mauricio.martins@telet.com.br>
- Re: SNMP
- From: Michael Shalayeff <mickey@lucifier.dial-up.user.akula.net>
- Re: SNMP
- From: Jon Ribbens <jon@oaktree.co.uk>
- Re: SNMP
- From: Artur Grabowski <art@stacken.kth.se>
- Re: SNMP
- From: Artur Grabowski <art@stacken.kth.se>