Re: PF and a feauture I requested weeks ago

[Jon Landry <jl_email_lists@comcast.net>]

van Helsing wrote:
> 
> So I'm sorry if somebody gets confused. :-)
> But it's not possible to use PFSYNC e.g. via IPSec.
> But IPSec is maybe the best solution to tunnel it...
> 
> vh

from this archived message:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=109053110406168&w=2

"Code exists to make pfsync work point-to-point rather than multicast,
which allows the protocol to be protected with IPSec and makes use of
pfsync without dedicating an interface to it. Please let me know if
you'd like to test this.

-Ryan"

I'm sure Ryan McBride wants to hear from you as it seems you are ready 
to fully test this for him and report back.

-Jon Landry