[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
softupdates recommendation
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: softupdates recommendation
- From: "Sancho2k.net Lists" <lists@sancho2k.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 23:06:39 -0600
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
I was hoping to get a group concensus on the use of softupdates.
The FAQ says that "Soft Updates are still in development as a whole" but
they do sound mighty appealing.
Are softupdates used my many without a great danger relating to the
problems discussed? Can I consider it safe to implement them on
filesystems used heavily with a lot of disk activity to generally speed
the system up?
One area that I wanted to try to improve (without forking out $$$ for
scsi host adaptor and disks) was the performance of the system during
anoncvs updates. My vmstat output looks like this during it:
procs memory page disks faults cpu
r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr wd0 cd0 in sy cs
us sy id
1 7 0 111908 484404 215 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 243 522 25
2 1 98
0 7 0 111912 484400 279 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 296 569 84
1 1 98
0 7 0 111912 484400 709 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 261 821 53
2 2 96
I understand that the 7 in the second column indicates that my disk is
blocking and is the bottleneck. Will softupdates drastically improve
this? (ATA 66 7200 IDE disk.)
TIA for the responses,
DS