Re: propolice

[Peter Varga <peter.varga@screaminet.com>]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:48:12AM +0100, Hack Kampbjørn wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>Why has i386 only non-exec stack but not non-exec heap?
> >
> >
> >This has been discussed.
> >
> >
> >>Why does Theo 
> >>like the UltraSparc III? What's this 'per page X bit' Theo talked about?
> >
> >
> >This has also been discussed.
> >
> Sorry, that was meant to be my point.
> <note to=self>be more verbose</note>
> 
> If the original poster needed to ask that question then there has been a 
> lot of "non-sense" discussion on this list lately. Specially my last 
> retorical question should give a hint to his question (Is there any way 
> to tell the hardware what is executable and will it cause a sigsegv?)

Are you quoting me by the sentence in parenthesis?

I was _not_ the original poster.

> 
> -- 
> Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
> 
> Hack Kampbjørn