Re: propolice

[Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>]

> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>Why has i386 only non-exec stack but not non-exec heap?
> > 
> > 
> > This has been discussed.
> > 
> > 
> >>Why does Theo 
> >>like the UltraSparc III? What's this 'per page X bit' Theo talked about?
> > 
> > 
> > This has also been discussed.
> > 
> Sorry, that was meant to be my point.
> <note to=self>be more verbose</note>
> 
> If the original poster needed to ask that question then there has been a 
> lot of "non-sense" discussion on this list lately. Specially my last 
> retorical question should give a hint to his question (Is there any way 
> to tell the hardware what is executable and will it cause a sigsegv?)

My point is:

I have described this already.  Go check the archives, you moron.