[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: propolice



Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>Why has i386 only non-exec stack but not non-exec heap?
> 
> 
> This has been discussed.
> 
> 
>>Why does Theo 
>>like the UltraSparc III? What's this 'per page X bit' Theo talked about?
> 
> 
> This has also been discussed.
> 
Sorry, that was meant to be my point.
<note to=self>be more verbose</note>

If the original poster needed to ask that question then there has been a 
lot of "non-sense" discussion on this list lately. Specially my last 
retorical question should give a hint to his question (Is there any way 
to tell the hardware what is executable and will it cause a sigsegv?)

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards

Hack Kampbjørn