[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: propolice
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>Why has i386 only non-exec stack but not non-exec heap?
>
>
> This has been discussed.
>
>
>>Why does Theo
>>like the UltraSparc III? What's this 'per page X bit' Theo talked about?
>
>
> This has also been discussed.
>
Sorry, that was meant to be my point.
<note to=self>be more verbose</note>
If the original poster needed to ask that question then there has been a
lot of "non-sense" discussion on this list lately. Specially my last
retorical question should give a hint to his question (Is there any way
to tell the hardware what is executable and will it cause a sigsegv?)
--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Hack Kampbjørn