[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transprent Firewall over PPP
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: Re: Transprent Firewall over PPP
- From: Philipp Buehler <OpenBSD@fips.de>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:03:49 +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: misc@openbsd.org
- References: <20020730231227.09c42216.gregf@elitepimps.org> <20020730231227.09c42216.gregf@elitepimps.org> <20020731104455.A11783@pohl.fips.de> <4.3.2-J.20020801091500.00c4ae40@172.16.24.10>
On 01/08/2002, Dirk Rosler <dirk@unicircuits.com> wrote To misc@openbsd.org:
> >Client----Bridge----DSL-Modem----DSLAM/Internet
> >
> >Where one uses PPPoE between Client and DSL-Modem.
> >
> >pf(4) on the Bridge could peek into the PPPoE packets.
>
> As the external interface will be a dynamically assigned address, and
> internal addresses probably private addresses, how will that work on a
> bridge? Can you NAT on a bridge?
No. A bridge has per-se no IP addresses. The assigned IP is at the Client,
that's the whole point.
> I am also thinking in a WLAN context here, where a wireless interface
> operates in true access point/hostap/bridge mode and the other interface is
> PPPoE DSL...
Bleh, you really dont understand. The bridge is doing *nothing* except filtering.
If you go into this "context", it would be a router and doing PPPoE on its own,
like it is now already capable of.
ciao
--
Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p>
#1: Break the clue barrier!
#2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ?