[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ssh protocol version 1 and 2 allowed?
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: Re: ssh protocol version 1 and 2 allowed?
- From: Toni Mueller <openbsd-misc@oeko.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:26:35 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- References: <4947.10.0.0.3.1025473925.squirrel@mail.sancho2k.net> <20020630141830.0d875bae.grendel@zeitbombe.org> <20020701101320.GC29536@schlund.de>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Hannah Schröter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 02:18:30PM +0000, tedu wrote:
> >[...]
> >The real problems with v1 have been corrected, as in deattack.c. The
so you say that using v1 is mostly safe (enough) now, not that much
better than using v2?
> >v2 only, so you aren't ever stuck in a situation where you only have a
> >v1 client available and can't login.
Hmmm. A few months ago I switched everything to a recent OpenSSH and
then everything to v2 only. Esp. when there were rumours that having
v1 enabled should make the server suspectible to attacks w/o MITM.
> However, I have the feeling that v2 is slower in the connection setup,
> especially over slow links like analog modem dialups.
With compression enabled, I take the hit on connection setup, but
the speed during regular usage afterwards is fine for me.
Best,
--Toni++