[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: djb apps in 2.9 packages? - djbdns, qmail, ect...
Unfortunately, it _does_ have to do with licensing. We took the safe
route and ommited the djb packages for 2.9.
In the commit messages, I wrote this:
PERMIT_PACKAGE_*: Yes -> No
No license, or license not clear
--
Cam
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Curtis Collicutt wrote:
> Does anyone know the status of the djb app packages in
> 2.9 - they don't seem to be in the packages section, and
> it makes me curious because all of the djb apps are
> missing (djbdns, qmail, publicfile, daemontools)?
>
> Just wondering what's going on with them, as I can't seem
> to find anything in the mailing lists that would suggest
> a reason as to them not being included.
> PS. I hope this has nothing to do with the recent IPF
> license review, considering djb seems to have the
> same type of license. But, that's why they are not
> in the source...