[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: djb apps in 2.9 packages? - djbdns, qmail, ect...



Unfortunately, it _does_ have to do with licensing.  We took the safe
route and ommited the djb packages for 2.9.

In the commit messages, I wrote this:
PERMIT_PACKAGE_*: Yes -> No
No license, or license not clear


--
Cam



On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Curtis Collicutt wrote:
> Does anyone know the status of the djb app packages in
> 2.9 - they don't seem to be in the packages section, and
> it makes me curious because all of the djb apps are 
> missing (djbdns, qmail, publicfile, daemontools)?
> 
> Just wondering what's going on with them, as I can't seem
> to find anything in the mailing lists that would suggest
> a reason as to them not being included.

> PS. I hope this has nothing to do with the recent IPF
>     license review, considering djb seems to have the
>     same type of license. But, that's why they are not
>     in the source...