Re: A rookie question on BIND &/| name servers

["J.C. Roberts" <unknown@abac.com>]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:50:06 +0100 (CET), you wrote:

>Both Bind and djbdns are valid choices for this 'caching' functionality.
>
>You don't want to mirror the root-servers. That causes more trouble then
>it's worth. Just trust the caches to do their work properly.
>
>With djbdns's dnscache you can keep an eye on the memory requirements of
>the cache.
>
>
>--
>Cam

I just wanted to say thanks for the info. I've got a lot of reading to
do before figuring it all out but from what I've read so far, djbdns
seems to be the ticket I'm looking for.

Thanks Again,

J.C. Roberts