[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- To: Jonathan Noack <noackjr_(_at_)_alumni_(_dot_)_rice_(_dot_)_edu>
- Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression
- From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry_(_at_)_atlantis_(_dot_)_dp_(_dot_)_ua>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:43:31 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: freebsd-stable_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org, Kris Kennaway <kris_(_at_)_obsecurity_(_dot_)_org>
Hello!
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote:
Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html.
Thanks for suggestion. I've just tried it, performance difference is
indistinguishable.
Also, use the link0 option with your fxp cards if they support it. See
the fxp(4) man page for more info. Here is an example /etc/rc.conf entry:
ifconfig_fxp0="inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx link0"
Well, I'm aware of this feature. I'm just evaluating performance of RELENG_6
systems on uniprocessor i386 system, and (for now) it's significantly worse
than under RELENG_4. So I've used fxp just for comparison (and to rule out
possible specific regression in rl NIC driver), not for anything more
serious.
Jonathan Noack | noackjr_(_at_)_alumni_(_dot_)_rice_(_dot_)_edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
Sincerely, Dmitry
--
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail: dmitry_(_at_)_atlantis_(_dot_)_dp_(_dot_)_ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org