[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression

On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:01:18AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jonathan Noack, and lo! it spake thus:
> Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there?  See
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html.

As Peter Jeremy mentioned in
the primary suspect (optimized copy/zero routines) would never happen
except on a real 586 CPU, and is totally disabled anyway.  See
sys/i386/isa/npx.c line 424-437 (line numbers from rev 1.163, salt to

#ifdef I586_CPU_XXX
    if (cpu_class == CPUCLASS_586 && npx_ex16 && npx_exists &&

The #ifdef will never match, and even if it did, the if() would never
kick in unless the CPU was actually a 586.  The #ifdef has been
disabled since rev 1.95 (2001/04/13).

(This isn't to say that there isn't something else hiding somewhere
that I686_CPU doesn't enable that it should, but just nipping another
round of the copy routine discussion in the bud...)

Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd_(_at_)_over-yonder_(_dot_)_net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
freebsd-stable_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"