[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core 2 Duo
- To: freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Core 2 Duo
- From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h_(_dot_)_schmalzbauer_(_at_)_omnisec_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:10:54 +0100
- Cc: philip_(_at_)_radford-online_(_dot_)_co_(_dot_)_uk
- Organization: OmniSEC
Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2007 10:10 schrieb Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri:
> On 2/25/07, Philip Radford <philip_(_at_)_radford-online_(_dot_)_co_(_dot_)_uk> wrote:
> > In the past on a P4 chip I would put pentium4 in the cputype
> > parameter in /etc/make.conf but are there any other settings here I
> > can adjust or any by using sysctl.
>
> I'm using CPUTYPE?=prescott amd it's safe, nocona broke my kernel.
I'm no compiler expert, but prescott and nocona are Net-Burst architectures.
Core(2) is a pentium-m successor, which was a completely different (x86)
architecture, so optimizations for netburst won't have a positive effect, if
they work at all.
I use CPUTYPE?=pentium-m, but I've never done any comparisions to binaries
compiled without CPUTYPE. After several years observation with CPUTYPE I
guess the improovement ist smaller than ever these days, and until now it was
rarely mesureable.
-Harry
--
OmniSEC - UNIX und Windows Netzwerke - Sicher
Harald Schmalzbauer
Flintsbacher Str. 3
80686 München
+49 (0) 89 18947781
+49 (0) 160 93860101
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org