[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question:encryption tool
- To: "Mike Tancsa" <mike_(_at_)_sentex_(_dot_)_net>
- Subject: Re: Question:encryption tool
- From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" <dghatikachalam_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:04:45 -0500
- Cc: freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
On 2/5/07, Mike Tancsa <mike_(_at_)_sentex_(_dot_)_net> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:21:18 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
>Thanks a lot, Our current backup system is veritas netbackup, and
>that to entire bacula is best thing for me,
>But the making the decision about switching to bacula was above my pay
>grade. I hardly see that happen anytime soon.
>so they wanted me encrypt these files, that is on the backup location
>before the netbackup scheduler picks up these files.
If you just want to encrypt the files with a password, openssl works
well and can be found pretty well on any platform.
[cage]% echo "this is a test" | openssl enc -aes-128-cbc -base64 -k
[cage]% echo "U2FsdGVkX1+gkWRJo5W7PGBLpilZmlEx3+cKML+32to=" | openssl
aes-128-cbc -d -base64 -k pass
this is a test
But you really want to take a look at /usr/ports/security/gnupg. It
seems all a bit confusing at first, but its a much better way to
encrypt data and manage who has access to decode files without having
to use a common passphrase.
It as well will work across multiple platforms
Thanks a lot Mike
freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"