Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel?
See PORTEPOCH Also, PORT_REVISION is PORTREVISION http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip_(_at_)_riderway_(_dot_)_com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"