[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: substitutions in pkg-plist
- To: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez_(_at_)_wait4_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: substitutions in pkg-plist
- From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:46:49 +0300
- Cc: freebsd-ports_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: infofarmer_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0200, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:53:48 -0200
> Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez_(_at_)_wait4_(_dot_)_org> wrote:
>
> > This works, but it is not clear why %%whatever%% macros fail silently.
>
> The point is not exactly "fail silently", but why the %D prefixing is
> explicitly necessary?
A single path alone on a line is a shorthand for %D/path. In case
of @exec, @unexec, @cwd and other commands there is no such
shorthand.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org