Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists_(_at_)_lists_(_dot_)_zabbadoz_(_dot_)_net> wrote:if it would be that easy, it would have happened 2 years ago.What can we as a community do to assist in making this easier and doable?
that is the question..NAT-T is a very useful feature, and not having it s a strike agains FreeBSD in a lot of eyes.. (It's needed for example to
talk to ASA firewalls for VPN stuff I believe). Anyhow I looked at the patch briefly and haven't seen anything horrendously terrible in it.. I'll look a bit more later but it doesn't seem to interfere with unrelated code that I can see.
Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd-net_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
_______________________________________________ freebsd-net_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"