[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf/altq
- To: akachler_(_at_)_telcom_(_dot_)_net
- Subject: Re: pf/altq
- From: ovidiu ene <ovidiue_(_at_)_unixware_(_dot_)_ro>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:04:32 +0200
- Cc: freebsd-isp_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
Hello Arie
We are using pf with altq for a router with 10 mbits Internet
connection, to share internet for more than 1000 users and it works fine.
Users are connected to the router using a pppoe server, which also works
fine. The problem is that we use HFSC algorytm on altq, which is a liner
algoritm and will not work fine for thousands of queues. We did not find
a way to cap CBQ per user. Give us more details... about your
infrastructure you are thinking of. If you plan to use high bandwidth
with not many queues, hfsc altq works great.
Best regards
ovidiu
Arie Kachler wrote:
Hello,
We need to replace our bandwidth management solution because it's not
working properly anymore.
Does anybody have experience with pf/altq in high traffic production
environments. We expect to run 100Mbps through each pf/altq box.
Man pages don't show shortcomings one may experience in real life.
Any real life experiences you can share will be greatly appreciated.
Arie Kachler
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org