Re: [Asterisk-bsd] Asterisk 1.2.7.1 ports

[Cian Hughes <cian_(_at_)_cian_(_dot_)_ws>]

I would agree that bristuff shouldn't be in the main port however the  
main port was sponsored by a company that wanted it.
I'm installing your port at the moment, I'll let you know how it goes...
On 25 Apr 2006, at 10:58, Thomas Sandford wrote:

> "Cian Hughes" <cianlists_(_at_)_cian_(_dot_)_ws> wrote:
> > I'm just wondering when we should expect an updated port of  
> > asterisk  on FreeBSD, the current is still at 1.2.4
>
> If you are not fussed about the bristuff patches, you can use my  
> updated version of the port at
>
> http://www.paradisegreen.co.uk/asterisk/
>
> [actually IMHO the bristuff should _not_ be in the official port,  
> or at least should be a separate port,
> precisely because it doesn't seem to track the official releases,  
> and so holds FreeBSD back to an
> old version of Asterisk].
>
> [sobomax - feel free to lift all or any of this version to include  
> in the official port]
> --
> Thomas Sandford
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD_(_at_)_lists_(_dot_)_digium_(_dot_)_com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd

_______________________________________________
freebsd-isdn_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isdn-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"