Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented

["David O'Brien" <obrien_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org>]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:33:41PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2008-02-23 16:48, "M. Warner Losh" <imp_(_at_)_bsdimp_(_dot_)_com> wrote:
> > This knee-jerk reaction against gnu find functionality baffles me.
> > The changes are trivial and make FreeBSD more compatible.  It is such
> > an obvious no-brainer that I frankly didn't expect anybody to bat an
> > eye.
> 
> So should I expect similar knee-jerk reactions to the just committed
> `finger compatibility' option to implement du -l for hardlinks?

You added a new useful feature - and you based the option letter on
prior-art (and resumable doen't conflict with POSIX).
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"