Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0

[youshi10_(_at_)_u_(_dot_)_washington_(_dot_)_edu]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Claus Guttesen wrote:

> > > sched_ule:
> > >
> > > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
> > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
> > > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41
> > > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47
> > >
> > > sched_4bsd:
> > > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43
> > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02
> > >
> > > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd
> > > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3.
> > >
> >
> > 4bsd vs ULE
> >
> > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
> >
> > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
> >
> >
> > ULE is always slower?
>
> In my case yes.
>
> --
> regards
> Claus
>
> When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
> the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
>
> Shakespeare

Sorry to say, but last year's Xeons were very lackluster in terms of capability/performance, and there were rumors flying around that the Conroes (desktop chips) fared better than the 1st gen Woodcrest (?) chips :(..

That's changed in the later Xeons though =\..

-Garrett

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"