[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why is it called /boot/beastie.4th ?
- To: Oliver Fromme <olli_(_at_)_lurza_(_dot_)_secnetix_(_dot_)_de>
- Subject: Re: why is it called /boot/beastie.4th ?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_(_at_)_des_(_dot_)_no>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:34:44 +0100
- Cc: freebsd-chat_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_ORG
Oliver Fromme <olli_(_at_)_lurza_(_dot_)_secnetix_(_dot_)_de> writes:
> I don't think it can be done currently, but it would be possible to
> implement. I haven't looked at the syscons code in a long time,
> though. Right now my focus is on the loader.
If you say the magic words (something like "I'm willing to work on
syscons once I'm done with the loader"), I'll have your application in
core@'s inbox in a New York minute :)
> In fact my PCX decoder supports that; runs crossing planes (standard)
> as well as runs crossing scan line boundaries (non-standard). In fact
> I have to admit that it currently doesn't support padding at all.
> Well, ppmtopcx never generates any padding, so I didn't care. I'll
> try to fix that, though.
Hmm, the spec calls for padding each scan line to the nearest multiple
of 16 bits IIRC, but it's been a long time.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_(_at_)_des_(_dot_)_no
freebsd-chat_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"