[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
nForce 3 150 vs. VIA K8T800
- Subject: nForce 3 150 vs. VIA K8T800
- From: lars.tunkrans at bredband.net (Lars Tunkrans)
- Date: Fri Nov 19 15:59:37 2004
David G. Lawrence wrote:
>>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, David G. Lawrence wrote:
>>>So, given a choice between an AMD64 motherboard with nVidia nForce
>>>3 150 chipset or VIA K8T800 chipset, which one actually works and
>>>what are the tradeoffs?
>>well I had a Gigabyte G-K8NS with a socket 754 and nForce 3 250
>>chipset but switched to a ASUS A8V delux socket 939 with a chipset
>>VIA K8T800 and the latter is better as well more things seem to work
>>with less down sides. I think the latter is much better with the
>>dual channel memory and runs faster. But then again this is only my
>>recent experience with AMD64.
Today I tried the VIA 8237 SATA I/F for the first time on my socket 939 K8T800-PRO
MSI K8T Neo2 Fir Board, it worked.
So now I know that :
the K8T800-Pro is recgonized as VIA_K8
the re0 Gigabit Ethernet I/F works
the usb I/F'es works
the PATA and SATA works.
the sigmatel STAC9708 AC97 chip is reconized. ( although I use the EMU10K1 )
the FireWire ( via VT6306 ) i/F is regonized, I have yet to try it.
Basically I have not had any of the problems with onboard NIC's that seems to be
abundant with the Nforce3 chipset.
Not any ACPI-APIC problems.
Choose socket 939 because of its superior DualDIMM Memory bus.