[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114
- To: Pawel Worach <pawel_(_dot_)_worach_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114
- From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:01:39 -0500
- Cc: freebsd-acpi_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org, freebsd-current_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org
On Friday 16 November 2007 04:41 pm, Pawel Worach wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > Please test the following patch on -CURRENT:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20071114.diff.gz
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks good here on a ThinkPad T60 except for a new LOR.
>
> acpi_ibm0: <IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras> on acpi0
> lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable)
> 1st 0xc083cb00 LED mtx (LED mtx) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:263
> 2nd 0xc09cc304 ACPI IBM extras (ACPI IBM extras) @
> /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi_ibm/../../../dev/acpi_support/acpi_i
>bm.c:311 KDB: stack backtrace:
--- >8 --- SKIP --- >8 ---
I have to admit that I haven't really tested anything under
sys/dev/acpi_support because I don't own any of these laptops. :-(
Anyway, can you test the following?
--- sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 25 Oct 2007 17:30:18 -0000
+++ sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 16 Nov 2007 22:43:39 -0000
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
sc->led_busy = 1;
sc->led_state = onoff;
- AcpiOsExecute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc);
+ acpi_queue_task(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc);
}
static void
Thanks,
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-acpi_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org