Re: 5.4=>6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

[Andriy Gapon <avg_(_at_)_icyb_(_dot_)_net_(_dot_)_ua>]

on 19/05/2006 18:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 19/05/2006 17:54 [LoN]Kamikaze said the following:
>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI]
>>>
>>>
>>> Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the
>>> following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and "C1
>>> disconnect" enabled for 2 days without any problems.
>>>
>> Did you file a PR with your fix?
> 
> Not yet. I wanted to receive some feedback and test results first (and
> kinda hoped that this will get included without a PR).
> 

I've created a PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97785

Thanks again to John Baldwin for his very much improved version of the
patch.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-acpi_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"