[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ACPI interrupt problems? (Was: HEADS UP: Starting socketlocking merge)
- Subject: ACPI interrupt problems? (Was: HEADS UP: Starting socketlocking merge)
- From: jhb at FreeBSD.org (John Baldwin)
- Date: Mon Jun 14 17:17:02 2004
On Monday 14 June 2004 01:14 am, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:36, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > That's difficult for those of us who are affected by the ACPI
> > > > interrupt allocation problems. If ACPI isn't going to be fixed soon
> > > > (it's been 2 weeks already), then the last commits should be backed.
> > >
> > > It would help if you'd point out the email message with this problem
> > > and what commits caused it. I'm not aware of any new interrupt
> > > problems and haven't seen email about it on acpi_(_at_)__(_dot_)_
> > I don't know which commit but I believe John Baldwin is working on a fix.
> > The problem occurs between 02:30 29/05/2004 UTC and 04:00 29/05/2004 UTC.
> > (ie code from the former works, code from the later doesn't)
> > The problem exhibits itself as bfe0 watchdog timeouts (on my system
> > anyway)
> Have you isolated it further? Try backing out rev 1.15 of
> acpi_pci_link.c, referenced by this email (click on link for a patch):
> I do believe John is working on this. A temporary backout might be in
> order but I'll let him decide on that. Either way, the right direction
> for this stuff is to keep moving forward and this commit was definitely a
> step that way.
It can be backed out for now I guess. Basically, the code doesn't work at all
with regards to routing virgin interrupts and this change just exposed that.
John Baldwin <jhb_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Visit your host, monkey.org